Biography of Olga Budina
Olga Budina is the only Russian actress who starred in two films nominated for an Oscar: “The Diary of His Wife” (Ivan Bunin’s mistress, poetess Galina Plotnikova) and “The Romanovs – a Crowned Family” (Grand Duchess Anastasia). Wide popularity came to her after filming in the television series “Border. Taiga novel" (doctor Marina Goloshchekina).
In the photo: Olga Budina
Author of the book “The Diary of Olga Budina. Talking pregnancy." Patron of arts and founder of the “Amulets of the Future” foundation. She has been awarded many awards, including the “Legend of Russia”, the Order of Mikhail Lomonosov and the “Glory of the Nation”.
Height, weight, age. How old is Olga Budina
Height, weight, age. How old is Olga Budina? You can’t help but think about these questions, because at 42 years old, with a height of 162 centimeters, she weighs 52 kilograms. What helps her keep herself in such excellent shape is not the fitness club, although it is also present in Olga’s life, but the eternal busyness of the TV presenter. Since childhood, she has not been able to sit still: she either attends clubs, sews theater costumes at night, or even works part-time as a tour guide.
Time passed, the schoolgirl grew up, but the habit of being constantly on the move, learning something new, rushing to help someone remained. Just by looking at the photos of Olga Budina in her youth and now, you can recharge yourself with energy and positivity for the whole day.
Childhood, youth, family
Olya was born in the winter of 1975 into the family of Alexander and Lydia Budin from the town of Odintsovo near Moscow. Father, Alexander Sergeevich, worked as an electrician, mother, Lidia Ignatievna, worked as an accountant. According to the actress, on her mother’s side, her family has noble roots, and her great-grandmother on her father’s side served as a church warden.
Olga Budina in childhood
The girl became independent early, as she felt responsible for her little brother. When Olya was in fourth grade, she decided to enroll in a music school, applied and enjoyed learning scales on the accordion and piano. At home I listened to records by Vladimir Vysotsky, for which I stood in line at music stores. The actress recalled about herself in those years: The teachers encouraged the girl’s activity, despite the fact that Olya was not good at exact sciences. She was allowed to write abstracts to complete the quarter with B's in physics and geometry. But Budina wrote her essays with straight A's and even graduated from the school of young philologists at Moscow University. She was awarded the qualification of a tour guide - Olya led excursions to Pushkin’s Zakharovo not far from Odintsovo. She was a soloist in the school choir, played in the orchestra, and later performed as part of an amateur vocal and instrumental ensemble at dance evenings.
Having received secondary education, Budina began studying with music teachers in order to enter the coveted Gnesinka. One day, while walking along Arbat, I saw a large number of applicants near the Shchukin School. Intuitively, Olya decided that she simply had to “do a real kid thing” and sign up for an audition. Budina did not even prepare; her extensive song and poetic repertoire allowed her to choose any composition.
Olga Budina in her youth
Before the commission, which was headed by Vladimir Etush, Olya read the fairy tale “The Goat Had No Grandmother,” then there was the fable “The Butterfly and the Dove,” and then the girl read the poems of Frederico Garcia Lorca in Spanish and immediately gave a translation in Russian. The examiners were captivated, especially by the dance with the “attribute” - Budina, out of excitement, forgot the word “prop”, which she wanted to call her talisman shawl. She was the only one who received three “excellent” marks and, completely happy, became a first-year student.
True, the euphoria into which the girl fell almost became a reason for her expulsion, since after the first session she received conditional passes in all subjects. Only then did Budina begin to study hard, sitting in the classroom all day, staying at night in the gym. In her second year, Olga received an “excellent” in acting. But after graduating from university in 1997, the aspiring actress remained outside the repertory theaters because she did not have time for the screenings from filming.
Adopted son Alexander
Budina owns a fund that helps orphans. A woman travels to different cities to solve difficult situations in orphanages and foster families. The celebrity went to Adygea and found out about a guy who writes poetry. Budina liked the gifted child Sasha, 10-12 years old. The star began corresponding with the teenager and invited him to the capital for the holidays.
Budina invited Alexander to the New Year and prepared a cultural program. The actress found out that Sasha has a grandmother. Alexander had the opportunity to live with her. Olga Budina raised the issue of guardianship. The TV presenter wanted to draw up documents so that in the future Alexander would receive an apartment and enroll in a university with benefits. Olga planned for Sasha to move to Moscow.
Alexander stayed overnight in a hotel or in a room with Naum. The guy wanted to become a doctor or an emergency worker. The artist planned to adopt the young man, but was faced with mistrust.
Reasons why Olga Budina changed her mind about adopting Alexander:
- the boy brought gifts from his grandmother for Olesya, and did not share them with the actress and Naum;
- the presenter saw that the orphan treated her as a person who gave money for all his desires;
- Sasha did not treat Olga as a mother, she was not an authority for him;
- the star understood that the guy was cunning and deceiving;
- the writer realized that the orphan was teaching Naum to deceive his mother and had a negative influence on him.
The last straw was when Olga found out that Alexander smokes. Sasha hid that he was indulging in nicotine and lied to Budina’s face. The actress regularly found cigarette butts and realized that this would not continue. Alexander stopped coming to Moscow.
Olga Budina's subscribers supported her decision to return Sasha to her grandmother. They understood the idol's intentions, and they were also offended by the orphan's behavior. Although Budina returned her adopted child, the star realized that she needed to devote more time to Naum. She was very offended that Alexander deceived her, was a hypocrite and treated her consumeristly.
Creative path
Budina's film debut was her work in Raisa Shibeko's short film “Playing the Little Prince” in 1996.
Next, immediately after graduating from the Shchukin School, Olga starred in the comedy “Shouldn’t we send us... a messenger?” The role of Vicky, a call girl, was small, but the girl managed to work on the set with such masters of cinema as Lev Durov, Nikolai Trofimov, Lyubov Sokolova. The main role in the film was played by comedian Mikhail Evdokimov. Until the end of the nineties, the actress starred in three more films, and in the acclaimed school television series “Simple Truths” she got the role of English teacher Vera Markelova.
“Simple Truths”: Olga Budina as Vera Markelova
Gleb Panfilov’s film “The Romanovs – the Crowned Family” was released at the very beginning of the new millennium and made a stunning impression on the audience. The director approached the selection of candidates for the roles of the daughters of Nicholas II (Alexander Galibin) and Empress Alexandra (Linda Bellingham) very carefully. He invited almost all the girls in Moscow and the Moscow region to auditions.
When Olga decided to go to the casting, she had no idea what kind of test awaited her. According to the script, the princesses and the crown prince fell ill with measles and everyone had their heads shaved before leaving for Tobolsk. At the audition, Budina was seated in front of the camera and... her luxurious hair was cut off. Seeing herself completely bald in the mirror, Olya almost fell into hysterics, but in the end she was approved for the role of Grand Duchess Anastasia.
For the film "The Romanovs - the Crowned Family" Olga Budina was shaved bald
The other three sisters were played by Yulia Novikova, Olga Vasilyeva and Ksenia Kachalina. The Russian nomination committee nominated the film about the last year of the life of the imperial family for the Oscar award in the category “Best Foreign Film.” Budina gained invaluable experience working in big cinema. My hero. Olga Budina In 2000, a psychological drama directed by Alexei Uchitel, “His Wife’s Diary,” about unknown pages in the life of the writer Ivan Bunin, was also released. Olga got the role of Galina Plotnikova, poetess and lover of Ivan Alekseevich. The actress managed to convey the subtlest nuances of relationships in a love triangle. A brilliant ensemble of actors - Andrei Smirnov, Evgeny Mironov, Sergei Vinogradov - created a unique atmosphere of the thirties of the last century. In 2001, Budina was awarded the State Prize in the field of literature and art.
Olga Budina in the film “His Wife’s Diary”
Budina became widely known for her role as the unfaithful wife of Captain Goloshchekin (played by Alexey Guskov) in Alexander Mitta’s television series “Border. Taiga novel." The love that broke out between her heroine and Marat Basharov’s hero, Lieutenant Ivan Stolbov, was played so convincingly that after the film was released, they started talking about the actors’ real romance. The passions that were boiling in the small border garrison riveted a huge audience to the TV screens.
Olga Budina in the series “Border. Taiga novel"
Budina recalled with warmth the Bryansk residents of the village of Shaikovka, where the filming took place: After her role in the series, Olga received filming offers regularly. With Yegor Beroev and Leonid Kuravlev, the actress starred in the adventure melodrama “Railway Romance”, with Alexei Serebryakov and Boris Khimichev in the military drama “Bayazet”, with Yuri Solomin and Inna Churikova in the series “Moscow Saga”.
Still from the film “Bayazet”
Budina considered the invitation from Vladimir Bortko to star in the role of Aglaya Epanchina in the film adaptation of the drama “The Idiot” as a huge success. The director brought the image of the general's daughter in love with Prince Myshkin to the same level as the image of Nastasya Filippovna, played by Lydia Velezheva.
Olga Budina in the TV series “Idiot”
Olga coped with her role brilliantly, she even gained weight on purpose, since she read from Fyodor Dostoevsky that her heroine loved to eat tasty and satisfying food. And she became so immersed in the era of that time that even in real life she began to behave like a young lady from the 19th century. The actress admitted that it was a great happiness for her to play in the same film with Evgeny Mironov and Oleg Basilashvili. The film was awarded three Golden Eagle awards and won seven TEFIs in 2003.
Olga Budina as Aglaya Epanchina
In 2003, the Prize of the Moscow Committee for Family and Youth Affairs was awarded to the actress’s work in the poignant children’s film “The Joys and Sorrows of the Little Lord.” In this film, Budina played the mother of an eight-year-old boy and said that the filming was full of love and tenderness.
Still from the film “The Joys and Sorrows of the Little Lord”
Olga created the image of a strong and boundlessly loving woman in the historical drama “Stalin’s Wife” (2006). Her Nadezhda Alliluyeva is sacrificial and courageous, even understanding who her beloved horseman has become, she cannot treat him as a leader, because she fell in love with her Joseph at the age of 12.
Still from the film “Stalin’s Wife”
The actress played the charming and romantic Katya in the comedy melodrama “Necklace for the Snow Woman.” Filming took place in the foothills of the Carpathians, where Olga, together with her partners Ivan Oganesyan and Oleg Fomin, enjoyed trying out alpine skiing. Later, Budina’s filmography included the roles of Elena Moiseevna in the social drama “Heavy Sand,” Anna Samoilova in the film adaptation of Natalya Nesterova’s novel “An Equation with Everyone Known,” and Tatyana in the comedy “Phoenix Syndrome.”
On the set of the film “Necklace for the Snow Woman”
Several times in television series Olga played female doctors. In addition to Marina Goloshchekina from “Borders,” viewers remembered her Elena Leonardovna in the film “The Personal Life of Doctor Selivanova,” as well as Olga Samoilova from “Zemsky Doctor.”
Olga Budina often played medical workers
The actress tried on the prosecutor's jacket in the crime drama "Mother's Heart." In this film she played an investigator from the prosecutor's office and at the same time a widow, left with her little son in her arms. Her filming partners were Grigory Antipenko, Lydia Fedoseeva-Shukshina, Valery Barinov.
Olga Budina in the film "Mother's Heart"
One of Budina’s last significant roles was her controversial Margarita Konenkova in the historical melodrama “Einstein. Theory of Love" (2013). The brilliant physicist was played by Dmitry Pevtsov, and her on-screen husband, sculptor Sergei Konenkov, was embodied by Alexander Baluev. Olga admitted that the character of her heroine, despite all her feminine charm, was far from feminine, as befits... a Soviet spy. But the man involved in the creation of nuclear weapons did not even suspect what his last love in life would lead to.
Still from the film “Einstein. Theory of love"
In 2021, the actress spoke in an interview about the filming that served as the catalyst for her departure from the profession: As for the television projects from which Budina left, this concerned the program “Good Evening, Moscow” and the program “About the Most Important Thing,” where she was the host. The actress also performed romances and bard songs in concerts, collaborated with orchestras, gave creative evenings, and was involved in charity work.
Difficulties in the life of an actress
Olga Budina filed for divorce from Alexander Naumov. At that moment it was very difficult for her. She had a hard time leaving her husband and his infidelity. But the difficulties in her life did not end there.
The son of actress Naum suddenly fell ill. Something incomprehensible was happening to the boy. He ended up in intensive care, and the doctors did not know what to do with the child, how to treat him. Only after 2 weeks his condition began to improve. Olga found a good homeopathic remedy and literally pulled her son out of the clutches of a serious illness.
There was no offer to help from my ex-husband. This was one of the most difficult periods in the life of Olga Budina. She had no money, she stopped acting, she had a sick son in her arms, and thoughts of suicide were spinning in the actress’s head. The woman was then saved from this desperate step by a child. He needed to be taken care of.
Every day I spray a spray against fungus and soap scum in the shower: I’m sharing the recipe
"St. Petersburg Opera" presented its version of "Electra": information and photos
I made a cozy hammock for my cat out of a cardboard box: step-by-step instructions
The family’s financial situation improved when Olga was offered the main role in the series “The Personal Life of Doctor Selivanova.” Using the fees from filming, the actress was able to buy a one-room apartment in Moscow and move there with her son.
Personal life of Olga Budina
In fact, Olga left the profession twice.
The first time was because of marriage. In 2003, the actress was a member of the jury of the Moscow International Festival and decided to start filming documentaries. She interviewed guests of the event - Steven Seagal, Peter Greenaway, Gina Lollobrigida. The process of completing the film, which entered the Berlin Film Festival, was hampered by a lack of budget to complete it. As a result, the money for the painting was given by entrepreneur Alexander Naumov, whom Budina was introduced to by friends. The actress herself did not notice how she fell in love. Soon she married a charismatic man. Upon learning of her pregnancy, Olga was in seventh heaven and decided to devote herself to her family, leaving filming.
Olga Budina and Alexander Naumov
But life with Naumov turned out to be not as fabulous as she had dreamed. Alexander began to have problems in business, he became increasingly alienated from his wife and son Naum, born in 2004. The pregnancy took place in a nervous environment, the birth was difficult, and the child stopped breathing at the 11th minute of life. The doctors saved him, but convinced Olga that her son would be mentally retarded.
Olga Budina with her son Naum
The family lived in boarding houses near Moscow, the husband and wife practically did not intersect - she took care of the child, he exclusively worked. When the baby was nine months old, Olga could not stand it and left Naumov. During the divorce, Naumov stated that he received the minimum salary, and alimony payments would be about five thousand rubles. Two years after the collapse of her hopes, the actress returned to the profession, starring in TV series and commercials.
Olga Budina without makeup
She managed to earn money for an apartment on her own, bought a car and a dacha. My whole life was focused on my beloved son and cat. When the time came, Budina sent the boy to the British Atlantic International School, founded at the University of Cambridge, but later transferred him to home schooling. Naum also entered the music school at Gnesinka, which his mother so dreamed of going to.
In the program “Secret for a Million” in 2021, Olga spoke for the first time about the orphan boy Sasha, whom she wanted to adopt in order to provide him with a good start in life. But after talking with the boy and going on vacation with him, she was disappointed: Sasha deceived and manipulated her, and the actress realized that she could not introduce a person into the family whom she could not trust.
The failed adopted son of Olga Budina
The actress has not yet gotten married, although rumors have appeared in the media about a certain admirer with serious intentions who found a common language with her son.
Brief biography and parameters of bikinist Olga Putrova
Olga Putrova-Bogacheva is a Russian fitness bikini. Born December 23, 1985. The bikinist's height is 1 m 75 cm. Weight is 62.5-63 kg (competition - 60 kg).
He has been involved in sports since childhood. And considering that the age of the athlete and model has already passed 30, this is quite a decent amount of “experience”.
For more than 8 years, the bikini mole has been engaged in bodybuilding and practicing fitness. She has been competing at championships in the fitness bikini category for 2 years.
Championships
- 1st place at the European Championships in Spain, Santa Susanna 2014
- Absolute champion at the Olympia Amateurbikini Championship in the Czech Republic, Prague 2013
- 1st place at the Arnold Classic Championship in Spain, Madrid 2013
- 2-time absolute champion of Russia (2013-2014)
- Absolute champion of the FitnessHouse championship in Russia, St. Petersburg 2013
- Multiple absolute champion, Moscow bikini athlete, etc.
At the moment, Olya has moved to IFBB Pro - i.e. became a professional athlete in this category.
Interesting facts about the life of an athlete
The famous Olga Putrova, who became famous as a fitness model, athlete and simply a beauty, began her “sports” path from school. Being a slender and very athletic girl, she was fond of volleyball during her school years. And her father, who was a school coach, helped her a lot in this.
In general, Olga’s biography is very modest. She was born in Moscow. After graduating from school, the girl, whose figure was already enviable for many representatives of the fair sex at that time, entered the Faculty of Physical Culture of the Moscow Sports Academy.
Approximately in her third year of studying at the academy, Olya Putrova began to become interested in hardware, regularly visiting the gym. But at first, the purpose of her visits was the banal idea of improving her own body. However, the trainer leading her class noticed the incredible success of the athlete and suggested that she practice “fitness bikini.” This is how Olga found her calling and at the time when she defended her diploma in 2010, she already had a specific goal.
Around 2012, Olya began to actively participate in various competitions, step by step conquering the jury at the Russian and European Championships and appearing in photos in popular sports magazines, as well as on the Internet.
On YouTube you can find many videos from the stunning Miss Fitness Bikini, in which she talks about the rules of training and the secrets of achieving sports success. Currently, Olya maintains her own page on Instagram, where she posts her photos. You can find her on Instagram at: @olga_putrova
Olga Budina now
The actress does not like unnecessary noise around her person.
She runs her own festival of family amateur theaters called “A Fairy Tale Comes to Your Home,” works at the “Protect the Future” foundation together with like-minded enthusiasts, and plans to continue writing books. Olga admits that solving the problems of social orphanhood is becoming much more difficult, for example the trial regarding the Uglich orphanage. Olga’s foundation gave him money for repairs, and later Budina found documents confirming the theft.
Olga Budina helps orphans
When she spoke about what was happening on television, the Prosecutor General's Office initiated an investigation, and the case went to court. But it was not possible to prove the guilt of all those involved; only the director of the orphanage received a suspended sentence, and the actress was banned from appearing in the institution in the future.
Olga Budina now
In a duet with director Vladimir Karabanov, Olga organizes creative performances, during which the problems of orphans are highlighted. Thus, in 2021, in the Sergei Rachmaninoff Concert Hall, a reading of the fairy tale “The Snow Queen” was held with the participation of Budina, accompanied by the Orpheus symphony orchestra.
Olga Budina gained weight and changed beyond recognition photo
Olga Budina gained weight and changed beyond recognition in the photo - all the magazines were full of such headlines. In fact, different sources write different versions.
Someone suggests that this is due to the fact that the actress did not act in films for a long time, and then, appearing at a social event in a closed dress, journalists were still able to see her plump figure.
Fans of the actress are more inclined to believe that after the birth of her son, Olga breastfed him, which is why she gained extra pounds. Or maybe this coincided with participation in the filming of the film “The Idiot”, where the entire film crew was fed mind-blowing pastries from a local bakery.
Budina herself admits that she is prone to being overweight and therefore does not pay attention to journalists’ attacks on her about her figure. Thanks to a balanced diet and willpower, the actress now looks stunning.
It is advisable to have dinner without television
— And what did you do after giving up filming?
— About six years ago I learned what social orphanhood is and what its scale is in our country. Created a charitable foundation. Whenever possible, I began to help solve the problems of foster families and orphans. In this area, it is impossible to get by with charity events or fundraising alone; it is necessary to cooperate with government agencies and officials. Let’s say my foundation aims to help someone, but if the official doesn’t want to communicate for some reason, I can’t change much. But a lot needs to change: develop the institution of schools for foster parents, support for foster families, create platforms for communication between future foster parents and children. For example, we, together with the portal “Usynovite.ru”, made 25 three-minute videos “Adopt, Moscow!” commissioned by the Moscow Department of Social Protection. This is a kind of educational program for those who want to become a foster parent. They also created an entire film program to help children in orphanages.
— Since November, you have been helping Matvey, a baby who received serious burns to his body due to the negligence of employees in the Tula maternity hospital...
— Now the baby is undergoing planned treatment in Moscow at the Speransky hospital, he finally has a mother
For almost a year there was no loved one next to Matvey, but after we drew public attention to the fate of the child, as many as three mothers appeared who fought for him in court. A lot of time and energy has been put into solving this problem and I'm glad it's finally resolved
— Do you still have time to read scripts and consider filming proposals?
— To be honest, I started many things, the story with Matvey took all my strength. But at the end of the year I had a “home” film festival. As an academician of the Golden Eagle Film Award, I have to watch all the nominated films and take part in choosing the best. I enjoyed watching the movie. It’s a wise decision that there are a lot of academicians - then you don’t worry so much that someone has to sign an “artistic verdict”.
Olga Budina hosted the program “About the Most Important Thing” with Dr. Sergei Agapkin. Photo: Rossiya Channel
— At the end of last year you revealed yourself as a musician. Together with my group they presented a musical program. Why do you need this?
— I called my group “The Color of Pomegranates.” We perform songs by Okudzhava, Vysotsky, Novella Matveeva, Veronica Dolina in different musical styles. This is an interesting, unusual and much loved experiment. My group consists of first-class musicians who work in the best musical theaters in Moscow and at rock concerts. For about two years we selected bard songs and came up with a new, modern musical cover for them. And all in order to extend the life of these songs - now for our children, who are brought up on different rhythms.
— Recently the series “Border. Taiga Romance,” which brought you popularity, celebrated its 15th anniversary. You were filming with pneumonia...
- As you can see, now I am alive and quite well-fed. And illnesses happen in any job; it’s just that in a situation with a tight filming schedule, it is sometimes impossible to find time for treatment. Then the whole process will come to a standstill, the schedules of other artists will fly, the rent for equipment will increase, and so on. Cinema is a cunningly and complexly constructed organism, and even with its own character. While we were getting ready to film in the sun, clouds rolled in. We wrote a script about a snowy winter - not a single snowflake fell. If you need rain, the sky will be clear, and vice versa. The picture is summer, so everything had to be filmed in 3 months of summer. And there are eight episodes, this is not a joke! Alexander Naumovich Mitta has been making movies all his life, not TV series. And everything should be exactly according to his plan, he is a great artist, a genius, and I could not let him down. All he could afford when I got sick was to give me a day and a half break. With no other options, I had to recover quickly. Our profession in this sense is a good health stimulant. Even if you are sick, you still deceive the body and convince it that you are healthy. There is no other way. For example, when they filmed “The Diary of His Wife,” there was absolutely no luck with the weather. In the shot we are all in summer clothes, and it’s 10 degrees outside! During the entire two months of filming, goosebumps and blue lips were covered with makeup. But on the set of “Zemsky Doctor” everything was the other way around. Sasha Lazarev and I filmed in 30-degree heat in a room where windows could not be opened, under lighting fixtures, and even under a blanket.
In “Zemsky Doctor”, among the actress’s patients was the hero Armen Dzhigarkhanyan. Still from the film
Actress Olga Budina left the cinema to tell the truth: “It’s really scary”
The ideas of transhumanism are offered to us as something very good: they say, just a small technological breakthrough, and people will be able to live forever. But supporters of this concept do not hide: a bright future and eternal life are for the chosen few, and the rest will be destroyed. How does transhumanism promote itself through Hollywood films and what does it actually represent? Presenter Anna Shafran talked about this in the First Russian studio with actress Olga Budina, who admitted that she left cinema eight years ago, trying to get to the bottom of the truth.
Starting the next episode of the program, Anna Shafran recalled that this week the Oscar Awards took place in the United States. As film critics expected, the winner was the film “Land of Nomads” - about misfits traveling along the roads of America who have not found themselves in life. This time, the film about people was recognized as the best, the presenter noted.
But pay attention to how much film production about a bright robotic future has been offered to us in recent years by Hollywood and the series producers who are serious competitors in the fight for the minds of viewers.
And, by the way, the director of “Nomadland” Chloe Zhao was simultaneously filming the film “The Eternals” - about a race of immortals who fight in space with their opponents. What is this if not the promotion of transhumanism with its ideas to create an immortal, eternal man? And there are dozens of such examples of the glorification of transhumanism in cinema.
Can only robots be positive characters?
For example, the series “Westworld,” which began as a saga about a person growing up, albeit in the surroundings of robots indistinguishable from humans in costumes of residents of the American frontier of the late 19th century. For the second and third seasons the meaning changed.
Robots are definitely positive characters, and people are mostly negative. Or another example - the aged, but still charming Terminator played by Arnold Schwarzenegger , as well as new androids appearing in films that evoke more sympathy than human heroes.
The film “Alita: Battle Angel” is a blockbuster made from a niche Japanese comic book, which clearly promotes the idea of “improving” a person through cyborgization. And the slightly forgotten “Avatar” by James Cameron ? There, a person becomes a superman not thanks to robotics, but thanks to the transfer of consciousness into the body of a three-meter alien giant. By the way, the sequel to “Avatar” should be released next year, and there is no doubt that billions of people will watch it.
The science-fiction film “Avatar” by James Cameron, in which a person becomes a superman not thanks to robotics, but thanks to the transfer of consciousness into the body of a three-meter alien giant, was watched by three billion people. But this is one of the most transhumanistic films, says Olga Budina. Photo: 20th Century Fox/Globallookpress
In all of the above films and many others, the main idea of transhumanism is promoted - a person in his current state is bad, weak and flawed, Anna Shafran draws the audience’s attention. And it would be necessary to improve it, either by partially robotizing it, or by completely replacing the body with a more advanced one. And the main idea is persistently developing: man is so bad that robots will be much better than him.
Once upon a time, the American science fiction writer Isaac Asimov formulated three laws of robotics. And the first of them says: “A robot cannot harm a person or, through inaction, allow a person to be harmed.” From this phrase invented by the writer, the conclusion is drawn: people are bad because they can harm other people, and robots are beautiful, sinless creatures worthy of inheriting the world.
Yes, transhumanism is not ordinary humanism, you need to understand! Some may think, well, you never know what they show in the movies. But in reality the threat is quite serious. Modern cinema is not so much a tool for entertainment as a most effective device for propaganda.
Or have you not noticed how the BLM ideas that have taken over the Western world are being imposed on viewers? A series about the life of Britain at the beginning of the 20th century, and among the aristocrats there are blacks. A series about Russia during the times of Catherine the Great - Prince Orlov is played by a black man. By the way, in the Russian aristocracy, unlike the British, there was one person from Africa - Abram Petrovich Hannibal , which once again confirms: we are not racists. But rewriting history to suit the modern liberal paradigm – what is this if not rabid propaganda?
It’s the same with the “homo agenda,” which, to be honest, I don’t even want to remember during Holy Week, but everyone understands what I’m talking about, what I’m talking about, said Shafran. According to her, it is now difficult to find a film or series that does not have a positive sodomite hero.
And, of course, the transhumanism actively promoted in films is not just fantastic details designed to enliven the plot. This is real propaganda, especially if you remember how many Hollywood stars share the ideas of transhumanism and really hope to either live until the time when it will be possible to transplant the brain into a young body, or freeze their body in order to lie in cryosleep until the moment when science can prolong the life of the body forever.
Ideas of transhumanism – from Bosch to Harry Potter
Who better to talk about how film propaganda works than a man who has starred in many popular films? Today our studio guest is the famous actress Olga Budina .
Anna Shafran: When did you notice that Hollywood was persistently promoting the ideas of transhumanism? When did this come to your mind?
Olga Budina: I really liked that you mentioned Avatar, which was watched by three billion people. In principle, this is one of the most transhumanistic films, in which living people are negative characters, and aliens, blue eared men, are positive heroes. And, of course, a person chooses to stay with them on some other planet.
Of course, this is not the only film that promotes the ideas of transhumanism. You can recall other films: “The Matrix”, “Blade Runner”, “Men in Black”, “Superheroes”, “Transformers”, “Terminator”, “The Lord of the Rings”, “Harry Potter”, “BeWar of the Worlds”, “Indiana” Jones."
You can start talking about transhumanism with the film adaptation of Mary Shelley “Frankenstein”. Or look at the paintings of the Dutch artist, master of the Northern Renaissance, Hieronymus Bosch - completely transhumanistic creativity. Moreover, all these works necessarily contain the idea of occultism. And all together this fits perfectly into the NASA Blue Beam project, rumors about which have been circulating on the Internet for a couple of decades. I think many people have heard about him.
The transhumanism promoted in films is not just fantastical details designed to enliven the plot. This is real propaganda, Olga Budina is sure. There was a conversation about this in the First Russian studio. Screenshot: Tsargrad
Why did immigrants from Eastern Europe create “their own empire”?
– When the idea that transhumanism was being promoted in Hollywood occurred to you, did you decide to get to the bottom of this story? Should I figure it out from the beginning?
– Who are the founding fathers of Hollywood? Neil Gabler wrote in his book An Empire of Their Own , the American film industry was created by Jews from Eastern Europe and Russia. In America they assimilated, however, they did not abandon their religion or occult practices.
They continue to determine Hollywood's policies and ideology even now. They control everything that is produced there. For example, the Oscar figurine was invented by the founder of the Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer studio and the American Academy of Motion Picture Arts, film producer Louis Barth Mayer . And this famous figurine is surprisingly similar to the ancient Egyptian god of sin Sokar.
Simultaneously with the creation of Hollywood in the United States, the Zionist movement and its connection with the authorities of different countries through large bankers from well-known families - the Rothschilds, Rockefellers, Morgans, Carnegies - were strengthening. Essentially, these are the same people who created the US Federal Reserve.
In 1921, Hollywood became a world-famous center for the film industry. Around the same time, the active financial expansion of the United States into Europe began, which led to its Americanization. The connection between bankers and cinema still plays a key role today.
The CIA, FBI and Pentagon have been closely cooperating with Hollywood for a long time. The latter is said to even censor Hollywood films. Now these organizations, like some others created within Hollywood itself, are closely monitoring that the themes of homosexuality, robots, artificial people, who are always positive heroes, are widely represented in films for children and youth. At the same time, living people are shown as extremely imperfect creatures with an unbalanced psyche and generally a little “cuckoo”.
Since the early 1960s, Hollywood films have been aimed at lowering the viewer's threshold of psychological perception of horror, violence and any aggression. That is, the threshold of humanity is rapidly falling down, and positive heroes are dehumanized. This happens because the viewer always associates himself with the main positive character.
Who are our main characters? Spider-Man, some transformers, cyborgs and even the living dead. No one remembers the Hays Code, which existed in Hollywood in the 1930s. Then, during the Great Depression, he affirmed some universal human values, which helped people cope with the situation.
It was this Code that stated that Hollywood film producers are responsible for the development of society. This is due to the high degree of trust the audience has in the actors and in the events shown in the films. People really often believe what they see on the screen in feature films. But they contain both historical inaccuracies and simply artistic fiction.
– That is, we can assume that the goal is to reformat consciousness, and this can be done very well with the help of a feature film.
– The film industry is a kind of social engineering that was originally conceived. Here's what the famous Hollywood actor Tom Hanks :
It seems to me that when an industry can take an idea and make it bright and captivating - so that the audience does not even suspect that they are letting in something that they would never have let in (if they knew what it was), then film is a social engine may mark some changes.
The chosen ones and the rest of the biomass are two categories of humanity
– Why is the task set to dehumanize people?
– The fact is that Hollywood from the very beginning stood behind the idea of dividing all of humanity into two categories - into certain chosen ones and everyone else. Who are these “others”? These are national human capital, human resources, biomass, biological objects. And we are already called “bioobjects” in relation to education, for example.
Hollywood is still run by the seven Jewish families that founded it. Chaim Bermant wrote about it : “Almost all of them were immigrants, but taken together they did more to shape the American mentality and American tastes than all the churches and even schools.”
Today we understand that the ideology of films and public opinion are all carefully shaped. For example, in the United States there is an MPAA rating system, which is considered the successor to the Hays Code. This system itself decides which film supposedly gets the most votes, which picture is worth watching and what place it occupies in the ranking. That is, everything is under strict totalitarian control.
And here we can draw a parallel with our cinema. Viewers often ask me why they show films on television that are impossible to watch. Why are they filming such nonsense? And here it is, the answer to these questions. I don't think our audience actually votes for these films. Maybe in our country there is some kind of monitoring company that tells us about the tastes of viewers?
– You’ve just raised a very interesting question. After all, many viewers say that they don’t want to watch all this dirt, squabbles, showdowns that are offered to them every day. And the answer from the creators is: there is a demand for all this, it gives ratings, so we show it, and we have no choice.
- I do not believe in this. I have been hearing questions about why dirt is shown on screens for more than 20 years. However, recently these questions have begun to be asked less frequently. Apparently because there is an active education of marginal taste among viewers.
Hollywood is no longer the world of art
“You’ve just painted a very demonic picture, which is hard to believe.”
- It will be even worse. It's really scary, but we have to know it, we just have to understand that this is how it is. Suffice it to recall how at one time the movement of abstract art was created with the financial support of the CIA and philanthropist Nelson Rockefeller . Moreover, the artists themselves were sometimes unaware of this. But this was also the forerunner of transhumanist movements.
So it's ridiculous to suggest that Hollywood is solely an art world. No, if you call a spade a spade, then this is not the world of art at all, it is an instrument of the cruelest and totalitarian influence on people’s consciousness. The general attitude is the derationalization of consciousness. That is, real neuro-linguistic programming (NLP). As Leon Trotsky , “literature and cinema are the most powerful tools of suggestion.”
– When I listen to you, I think: how can it be that an actress who is inside this industry suddenly rebels against that very industry...
– The actress who sits opposite you left cinema eight years ago, and somehow began to understand this whole matter.
– When I listen to this story performed by you, it seems that this is a terrible conspiracy theory. But there had to be some moment, a trigger that made you think about all this.
– When there was a feeling of falsehood, a feeling of untruth, a feeling of some kind of total deception that I was being forced to believe. It is generally impossible for actors and directors to go in a different direction, this is the situation today. All films are destructive in one way or another - either historical lies, or something marginal. When was the last time we saw something bright, kind, and eternal in a movie?
– There is a very significant difference when you watch movies of today and, say, Soviet times. This really stands out. That is, you realized for yourself that this is some kind of lie, something in which it is proposed to participate?
– I felt manipulated. Almost everything I said about Hollywood can also be applied to Russian cinema today. Our films, our actors look like Western ones.
– And here there are two options: is it simply following a certain fashion set in Hollywood, what would you like to hope for? Or is it that some destructive ideas are being realized within our cinema?
- Both.
“This is broader than reform, this is deeper than revolution”
– In your lectures, you spoke, in particular, about the Singularity University, created in California by the American inventor Ray Kurzweil and the founder of space tourism Peter Diamandis with the support of a number of corporate founders, including NASA and Google . What is the purpose of this university?
– Now in our conversation we are approaching the very beginning of building that very new wonderful world that Aldous Huxley . We can say that the first stage of its creation dates back to 1962, when the Esalen Institute commune settlement was founded in California, where there is no radio, no communications, or any media.
Around the same period, a grandiose restructuring of consciousness was taking place throughout the United States: the New Age appeared, a youth counterculture was formed, and the sexual revolution began.
The main laboratory of this entire “restructuring of humanity” became the Esalen Institute. As we remember, in the 1960s, first in the United States and then in Western European countries, a complete change of traditional values began, a breakdown of man in man. What was happening in America then can be described with a quote from the book “The Aquarian Conspiracy” by Marilyn Ferguson:
A powerful, although leaderless, organization is working in the United States to bring about radical change. The members of this organization managed to break some key elements of traditional Western thinking... This is broader than reform, this is deeper than revolution.
And this was done on purpose. Numerous futurological centers that have appeared in the United States can be called the forerunners of the transhumanist movement. And all this is connected with California, where Hollywood is located.
There is actually some kind of special zone here. California is home to Silicon Valley, the headquarters of the Church of Satan, the headquarters of Google, and Singularity University with its experimental site. We can say that California is a kind of center of consciousness mutation, the most advanced military developments and transhumanist experiments. And all this, in turn, is connected with the CIA and the Pentagon. Here's a ball.
– How can you tell if the film you are watching is about transhumanism?
– If it reveals the theme of overcoming the human in a person, if the heroes have a desire to break out of all this imperfection with the help of something supernatural. This is also the impossibility of accepting a good world, as if it does not exist with us. The world can only be evil or destroyed.
In transhumanist films, victory is always achieved through secret knowledge. Let's remember "Harry Potter", "The Lord of the Rings" and so on. This is what is being imposed on children. And victory is never achieved as a result of a person’s work on himself, as a result of moral improvement. This needs to be understood very well. That is, the progress of mankind is possible not because a person wants to achieve it himself. No, there is a certain “something”, that’s the only thing that can save us. And why, we’ll find out a little later.
And you won’t find any other film production today. She is absolutely transhumanist. Today, only the cheerful dead can be positive protagonists. I'm not asking you to just believe me. You need to sit down and think about what you are watching and see what is happening from a different angle. Then everything will become clear.
"Forewarned is forearmed"
Concluding the program, Anna Shafran admitted: she doesn’t know what else can be added to what was said. Perhaps the phrase that Captain Blood loved from the novels of Rafael Sabatini : “Forewarned is forearmed.”
In today's conversation, Olga revealed to us the goals of transhumanists. She talked about what was happening in Hollywood and the film industry in general. Goals that, in general, are not hidden and are not embarrassed by those who promote them. The digital revolution is in full swing and the world is changing, but most of us don't seem to notice it. They still don’t notice it, perceiving film propaganda as entertainment, and the dominance of gadgets and digital services as an additional convenience.
But that's not true. Transhumanists already control the world in many ways, and, apparently, the final step is not so far away. What should we do under these conditions? Well, I think the first thing to do is look around you. If something, from your point of view, is not right, then it’s probably worth digging into. Olga today presented us with the clearest example of how this can be. But everyone has their own path. Some have science, some have art. I think that our main task here, friends, is not to stop, to move forward. If we want our children to live in the world that we like, to which we are accustomed, then we must make our own efforts to preserve this world.
Think about it.
